--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ron Paul voted for the 'Authorization for Use of > > > Military Force Against Terrorists'. > > > > off wrote: > > He voted to go to Afghanisthan. > > > So, the U.S. is in a war and Ron Paul voted to go to > war. But, what, exactly, is the plan to win the war? >>
I told you, you lost the war, you are in a quagmire, not a war. The war was lost when you IGNORED Ron Paul and went to Iraq. YOU LOST THE WAR at that moment. You cannot win it. You Neocons have put your head in the sand. It is totally laughable. Ron Paul says: "Just come home", and " we are friends with Vietnam now, and we trade with them and visit them, the same will happen in Iraq over time. Just come home" That is his plan. OffWorld > > Why hasn't Ron Paul captured Osama bin Laden? If this > is an example of how Ron is going to win the war, then > I'm voting for McCain. > > > He voted against the Iraq war, but not surprising > > a Neocon like you distorts the truth. > > > So, the U.S. is in a war, which Ron Paul voted for; > and the U.S. is in a war in Afghanistan which Ron Paul > voted for; and the U.S. is losing the war in Afghanistan, > which Ron Paul voted for, and still supports, but I'm > distorting the truth? > > This doesn't make any sense. > > "THE BUSH administration's decision to conduct a review > of security, governance, and economic development in > Afghanistan reflects an overdue recognition that, six > years after the overthrow of the Taliban, the country > remains dangerously unstable. With Taliban attacks on > the rise and the opium poppy crop increasing, > Afghanistan is on the way to becoming a failed state, > a narco-state or both." > > Full story: > > 'Failure blooms in Afghanistan' > Boston Globe, December 22, 2007 > http://tinyurl.com/3x7u7e >
