And you know this because???

--- matrixmonitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> --- Most of them are on the wrong track of
> evolution.
> 
> 
> In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I find it amusing that you refer to me as a "TM
> true believer," 
> which
> > is not my position at all, but I do agree with
> Nabuloss that this 
> is a
> > drama of your own making. I don't see large
> numbers of meditators
> > desperate for a reconciliation with the movement,
> and I doubt 
> whether
> > there are many people who really want to go to the
> domes and are
> > excluded from them. Those who like the movement
> are still in it; 
> those
> > who don't have left and found something else. The
> TM movement is not
> > doing anything different today from what it has
> always done, and 
> it's
> > likely to go on doing it. People have a choice to
> be part of it or
> > not. There is no need for a "mediator," and there
> is no need 
> to "save"
> > anything. I would say that the TM movement is
> doing rather well at 
> the
> > moment; enrollment on campus is up, the new
> Student Union building
> > will be opening soon, and lots of people go to the
> domes each and
> > every day. I have no idea what the numbers
> currently are, but even 
> if
> > they are lower than a thousand, that's still a
> very large number 
> for a
> > small town of 10,000 people to achieve every day.
> The domes have 
> been
> > in continual  operation for about 28 years now (26
> years, I think, 
> for
> > the women's dome), which is an amazing success
> story. My advice to 
> you
> > is to let the people who enjoy the TM movement
> continue to enjoy it,
> > rather than continually denigrating them on this
> board. They are 
> good
> > people and they deserve better. 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "dhamiltony2k5"
> > <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Nabby, whoever you are, that is possible as an
> outcome and 
> possibly 
> > > likely as you say it in a way. Though history
> shows that people 
> do 
> > > stick around and continue in a way after things
> fall apart.  
> > > 
> > > So, what would you advocate to save or improve
> the situation for 
> your 
> > > campus community and the domes now?  The
> meditating "Maharishi 
> > > Effect" dome numbers?  
> > > 
> > > That the old-TM meditators and sidhas again just
> come together 
> with 
> > > their `faith and belief' in Maharishi?  
> > > 
> > > That the meditating community should forgive the
> differences and 
> > > forgive the past as things that keep people from
> the domes.  Do 
> you 
> > > think that the administrative asking or just
> hoping for a 
> forbearance 
> > > within the old-meditating Fairfield community
> would be enough to 
> hold 
> > > things together for the domes? 
> > > 
> > > I do not hear much language of reconciliation
> coming out of the 
> > > administration up there.  Is much more the
> language of hubris, 
> > > exclusion, abuse of power and extreme spiritual
> arrogance; that 
> they 
> > > live in a Maharishi bubble.  Your being one of
> the few tru-
> believers 
> > > willing to snipe and write publicly, even
> anonymously, about 
> these 
> > > things how would you advocate the situation to
> help?  Even if you 
> > > can't have the courage to sign your own posts, I
> am glad that 
> someone 
> > > is representing the TMmovement here. I do like
> seeing the TM-tru-
> > > believer view advocated here if only by you and
> Feste37 in snipe. 
> > > 
> > > Now, to save your TMmovement, could it be near
> time to bring in a 
> > > reputable outside mediator, As in `mediator'
> that is different 
> > > from `meditator'.   T'ould first probably take
> even just a 
> > > willingness on the part of the campus to even
> consider a process, 
> > > of `peace and reconciliation' with its
> meditators as a 
> possibility. 
> > > Would that Maharishi even allow it now.   
> > > 
> > > Could you advocate or even broach this to your
> people on campus.  
> May 
> > > be old themes of petition, like in post 3811
> (from six years ago)?
> > > 
> > > Déjà vu, the petition:  
> > >
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/3811
> > > 
> > > That Gordian knot of the life of the TMmovement?
>  Serious are 
> you, 
> > > young Jedi, in preserving the Maharishi Effect
> of the domes in 
> FF.  
> > > Could you advocate reconciliation that could
> accommodate the 
> > > meditating community as it is in Fairfield to
> bolster the power 
> of 
> > > that effect?  
> > > 
> > > The spiritual high ground right now seems to be
> a `peace with 
> honor' 
> > > of the status quo of the meditating community
> otherwise.  The 
> > > meditating community seems quite active and
> healthy atop the 
> moral 
> > > high ground while the TMmovement by contrast has
> entrenched 
> itself 
> > > into the amoral low ground of excessive
> arrogance.  How do you 
> > > reconcile the two positions?  
> > > 
> > > -Doug in FF
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > Doug writing:
> > > > > Watching people here with the different
> spiritual groups, 
> there 
> > > >is a
> > > > > shakti or a spiritual energy meter that
> people do run for
> > > > > themselves. Is the experience in FF that
> people have of their 
> own
> > > > > experience with it. They are practiced at
> metering shakti. 
> They
> > > > > meter it & rate it. The Shakti meter, a
> different meter from 
> the 
> > > >BS
> > > > > meter.
> 
=== message truncated ===



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

Reply via email to