--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:23 PM, ruthsimplicity wrote: > <snip> > > > From what I have seen Vaj write, it looks like he is > > > familiar with this "stuff." > <snip> > > > > Also check out: > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mysticism > > > > It's a very good synopsis. > > Quoting Vaj from an earlier post: > > What are you proposing Off, that the > > observer's consciousness emits some sort of signal that travels > > back through time and then tells the measuring apparatus what > > it's supposed to indicate when the particle interacts with the > > machine? What about when there is no human observer and some > > automatic recording machine does the "observing"? Does the > > machine travel back through time? > > > > I think you've merely uncritically accepted a good number of false > > propositions which were sold to you by a pseudo-master and his > > physicists-marketeers. > > See: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler's_delayed_choice_experiment
I don't know if Vaj knows that the delayed choice experiment does not require a human participant. However, we have to be careful when drawing conclusions like "travel back in time" from his experiment and other related experiments as "time travel" is not necessary to develop a theory to account for the experiment. Interesting stuff though. Shows how elusive answers can be when you are out there on the cutting edge. >
