--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > Let me put it this way: If you can't *rule > > out* hypnosis just as a matter of common sense, > > we understand TM too differently to have a > > meaningful discussion. > > I am not part of this discussion, but how could "common sense" rule > out hypnosis? Some people "just know" things, others do not. That > does not necessarily imply a lack of common sense. It has the ring > of being patronizing to me.
Ruth, please read what I wrote again. Whether hypnosis can be ruled out by common sense depends on how one understands TM. In my understanding, it's a matter of common sense. If it isn't in Curtis's understanding, then he and I have vastly different understandings. That's all I was saying.
