Vaj, Such a tease. Spill the beans you old Master you. Do you think this flock will gather here ever again if not for your contributions? Without your vastness, what can ours ever be? You complete us as spice a dish, as gerUnds do poems, and as prostrations must adore the void.
Teach us with silence will ya, Bub? Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:37 PM, ruthsimplicity wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > But can you guess how they did it? :-) > > > > > > Hint: this wasn't mere individual bias, it was a bias inherent in > > the > > > procedure itself--one that could be leveraged to make the change in > > > metabolic rate seem deeper than it was. > > > > You got me there. I have these visions of the subjects flexing their > > muscles or stretching, but I don't have a clue. > > > That's another good guess. I would've guessed asanas and pranayama > (the basic rounding formula), although I certainly can't rule that out. > > But it's something other than that. I ain't tellin' till someone > guesses it though--or bothers to read this paper on their own lazy ass > and can engage. > > That's my ante. >
