--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > > On Behalf Of sandiego108
> > > >
> > > > He's suspended `till tonight at midnight. ;-)
> > >
> > > Then what? He turns into a pumpkin?
> >
> > Nah, he seems to be able to get real women over there.
>
> This one tickled me so much that I'm going
> to give Jim/Sandi Ego a chance to petition
> for me to be banned. I'm going to post some-
> thing I was saving for tomorrow morning right
> now.
>
> Here it is. ALL that Jimbo would have to do
> to get me banned for a week is to bring it
> up to Rick and ask him to ban me for the next
> week. I would go without a single protest, and
> be back a week later, without a scar.
>
> Uh...unlike the person who feels he has to
> change his username to come back after exceeding
> the posting limit, all while claiming to be fully
> enlightened. :-)
>
> Anyway, here it is, the offending post, the one
> that takes me definitely Over The Limit and allows
> Rick and the other moderators to Ban My Ass For A
> Week. If they choose to do so, I hold *absolutely*
> no grudges -- them's the rules. But I suggest that
> you wait TO ban me *until* someone like Jimbo or
> Judy or Shemp demands that you do so...that way
> it'll have a better overall effect.
>
> So anyway, here is the offending post that officially
> takes me over the 50-post-per-week limit:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <sandiego108@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I can appreciate the often rowdy atmosphere around FFL and that
we
> > don't always agree, but this guy has been crossing the line
lately
> > with references to child porn, Nazi atrocities, molesting women,
> > calling people every name in the book, etc. It is not the picture
> > of a healthy mind. If all it takes is one spam to get someone
> > removed, are there no guidelines *at all* for civility here?
> >
> > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's
> > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just
> > ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter.
>
> Jim,
>
> Here's the real story. What you're pissed off about
> is that while posing as an "enlightened one" you got
> busted on this forum for having zero self control about
> your compulsive posting and going over the posting limit.
> As a result, you had to stop posting for a week. Rather
> than just suck it up and make it a week and show some
> humility and some "enlightened fallibility," you chose
> to throw a hissy fit and pretend to "go away," as if it
> would be a long, long time before you ever deigned to
> reappear and as if you were done with us low-vibe suckers
> who don't appreciate your oh-so-highly-evolved-enlightened
> maginificence.
>
> Then you reappear, only a few weeks later, with a new
> username, and it takes less than a couple of days
> before someone figures out who you are. So what you are
> so pissed off about is that your act and your vibe are
> both so...uh...recognizable.
>
> Duh. Tough shit. Your act and your vibe are recognizable
> because they are clichés, as are you.
>
> If Rick, or ANY of the other FFL moderators, chooses
> to kick my ass off for a week or more to "lighten up,"
> that's cool with me. I will go without a word of protest.
> And I'll come back, as if nothing untoward has happened.
>
> You and your posts, I just lift my leg on and walk
> away from, the same way my dog does... :-)
>
What makes you think this is Jim Flanegin ?
The wisdom and depth in Jim's post transcended anything ever written
in this weird place. Just because he actually is enlightened (with TM)
and you are not, does not give you a reason to let your Pitta to get
out of hand. ;-)
