--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "The Secret" <L.Shaddai@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think we can all safely just toss the Collected Papers now,
> > don't > ya
> > > > think?  No more need to pretend...
> > > > 
> > > > The religion of Guru Devism is born.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > It's only 11 days since Maharishi gave up control of and 
> management 
> > > of the TMO and the clowns -- I mean the Rajas -- that have taken 
> over 
> > > have, as Curtis has indicated, already gone the extra mile to 
> > > solidify the "religious" nature of the Movement.
> > > 
> > > This supports the theory that I have presented on this forum from 
> > > time to time: that Maharishi abandoned the "TM is not a religion 
> or 
> > > philosophy" tenet of the TM Program because he was badgered to do 
> so 
> > > by the sycophants that have surrounded him for the past 35 years. 
> And 
> > > now those very sychophants have become the gate-keepers. 
> > > 
> > > They wore the poor man down by continually demanding that he give 
> > > them the "real" knowledge despite his continual admonitions that 
> the 
> > > TM technique was the full and complete program. Well, Maharishi 
> may 
> > > be enlightened but he is only human.  And at some point he threw 
> his 
> > > hands up and said: "Okay, if you want 'the real knowledge' I 
> guess 
> > > that's what I have to GIVE you." So now we've got THIS 
> catastrophy on 
> > > our hands: Rajas, tinfoil hats, Vedic peanut butter, etc.
> > > 
> > > Well, the inmates have got the reigns of the ship now and, 
> presto!, 
> > > we're prostrating once a day for the next month.
> > > 
> > > Abraham?  Can you please bring Isaac over to the alter?  Yeah, 
> and 
> > > bring some of those briquettes, too, while you're at it...
> > > 
> > 
> > Man,  I'm in a mood to laugh, laugh, laugh.  Thank you.  I haven't 
> had
> > such belly laughs in years.
> > 
> > But let me try to understand your arguments.  You're saying that
> > Maharishi did not have a hidden agenda of using the West to awaken 
> the
> > East, of spreading Maharishi brand Hinduism throughout the world?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, he had an agenda but, no, it wasn't hidden.  He told us quite 
> explicitly what he was doing by packaging TM as a non-denominational, 
> non-belief, non-religious program.
> 
> And, no, I truly believe it wasn't a case of him thinking: TM is part 
> of the Hindu religion and, therefore, I have to disguise it in order 
> for the suckers of the West to buy into it.  To him, TM was very much 
> a universal thing that was separate and apart from his own personal 
> Hinduism and could, on its own, stand apart from the trappings of 
> religion.  And it was with that very worldview that he packaged TM 
> and, successfully, brought it into the world.
> 
> And that's how things were progressing until about 1977-9 when things 
> started falling apart, largely from his own doing.  And I refer to an 
> abandonment of the above described universal non-religious approach.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> > This of course runs counter to the way it was explained to us wide
> > eyed  children:  that Maharishi was giving us what we needed at the
> > time and or that our raising the world's consciousness allowed the
> > Maha Rishi to cognize more and more of the Vedic truth, or as I 
> always
> > believed, to pull all of this shit out of his ass.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I don't know who was explaining all this to you or whether it was 
> done in some official capacity.  But I can tell you what I was taught 
> as both a meditator who learned TM from the 7-step program and as a 
> teacher in Teacher Training and that was that the TM Program was (1) 
> not a religion; (2) not a philosophy or belief; and (3) the 
> organisation taking on the responsibility of disseminating this 
> knowledge would itself embody those very principles (because to do 
> otherwise would be to stop being universal and therefore alienate 
> some potential practitioners of TM).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >  Dr. BM doesn't
> > just have those funny initials for nothing.  Of course we've read
> > which group of great seers and Shankaracharias granted him the title
> > he scribbled on that stationary in London.  Let me speak a bit more
> > sweetly and say that he pulled that one out of the air as well.
> > 
> > I don't quite get your problem with this becoming a religion.
> 
> 
> 
> As religions go, I would probably be the first in line to sign up.
> 
> But once it is a religion, you lose the potential to get 99% of the 
> people on the planet to sign up.  That's not being universal.
> 
> Hey, I'd love to have a guru and sit cross-legged on the Ganges at 
> the feet of a master and get darshan and all that.  Must be a 
> wonderful path!
> 
> But that's not the path I chose for myself; I actually bought into 
> the whole TM 20 minutes twice a day and then go into activity and, 
> according to one's own religion and values and traditions and common 
> sense, perform action.  I truly, honestly believe that to be THE 
> highest and fastest and most effective path to enlightenment.  And 
> for the vast, vast majority of Westerners (i.e., 99.9% of Westerners 
> in the TMO) performing action that entails a guru-disciple 
> relationship, following the dictates of Ayur-Veda and all the other 
> trappings of the current TMO is NOT the instructions of the TM 
> Program and,therefore, those 99.9% of the people in the Movement are 
> OFF THE PROGRAM AND DO NOT -- I REPEAT DO NOT -- PRACTISE THE TM 
> PROGRAM.
> 
> As I am fond of repeating on this forum, those individuals in the 
> Movement has sold their souls for a few shekels of darshan.  These 
> very people -- in particular, the Rajas -- who claim to follow 
> Maharishi by their very actions are spitting on the very guru they 
> purport to be devotees of.  They are rakshasas.  They are sycophants 
> who sucked the very blood out of the Movement and consciously traded 
> in the World Plan for the very selfish desire to be around an 
> enlightened being.  And in doing so they wore the poor bastard down.
> 
> They thought: oh, I am going to be around Maharishi and get into this 
> whole guru-disciple stuff and REALLY excelerate my evolution.  But, 
> in reality, by adopting such practises and beliefs they are OFF THE 
> PROGRAM and are hindering their evolution.  They may do the TM 
> Technique but NOT the TM Program, two very different things.
> 
> Indeed, much if not most of the activities of the TMO these days are 
> 180 degrees in diametric opposition to the TM Program.
> 
> And I will suggest one other thing to you while we are on the 
> subject: these activities of the TMO that I refer to as being off the 
> program that everyone from Bevan to the guy that does the janitorial 
> services for MUM are heavily engaged in were set up by Maharishi as a 
> test.  It's all a test by him to see who actually listened to his 
> instructions.  You know how everyone always says that the crazy way 
> that Maharishi instructs people to do this and that is designed 
> to "weatherstrip" them and acclimatize them and make 
> them "flexible"?  Well, that's precisely what this whole sordid set-
> up of the Movement is.
> 
> He's been waiting for 30 years for someone to say: STOP THE 
> INSANITY.  But no one has come forth 'cause no one paid attention in 
> TTC.
> 
> I did and it's very lonely here.
> 
> 
> 
> >  Look at
> > the structure.  To paraphrase the words of a founding father of the
> > United States of America, we're giving you a theocracy, Madam, if 
> you
> > can keep it.  That's right.  He erected a freakin theocracy.  What
> > do you expect a theocracy to do, declare that God is dead?  For 
> crying
> > out loud.
> >
>


Reply via email to