--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" > <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > Okay, this is old school. Is is the way verifications should be > > done. Do you think Nab will have the courage to admit his error. > > Let's see what the future posts hold. Tip of the hat to you, > > John Manning. > > Nabby will do exactly the same thing he did after > claiming that sandiego108 couldn't *possibly* be > Jim Flanegin, and then finding out that it was. > > He'll pretend he never said anything... > > This is what a TM TB calls "the truth."
Speaking of "the truth," I'm unable to find anywhere that Nabby made any claims as to whether the phrase "angels and gods" appears in SBAL. Can you please quote what I seem to have missed?