> I'm still not 100% convinced that sandiego is Jim but his latest > very interesting posts indicate he is. Unfortunately he is not > posting as regularily as before. He probably finds the atmosphere > here rather childish.
Yeah that sounds right. We are all too childish for Jim. You are having quite a Sunday aren't ya Nabby? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" > > <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Okay, this is old school. Is is the way verifications should be > > > done. Do you think Nab will have the courage to admit his > error. > > > Let's see what the future posts hold. Tip of the hat to you, > > > John Manning. > > > > Nabby will do exactly the same thing he did after > > claiming that sandiego108 couldn't *possibly* be > > Jim Flanegin, and then finding out that it was. > > > > He'll pretend he never said anything... > > > > This is what a TM TB calls "the truth." > > My mistake, sorry. > > Contrary to one certain Mr. Barry Wright, or Mr. Right personified, > aka the Turq, I have no problem admitting mistakes. > > I'm still not 100% convinced that sandiego is Jim but his latest > very interesting posts indicate he is. Unfortunately he is not > posting as regularily as before. He probably finds the atmosphere > here rather childish. >
