> > What kind of line are you trying to draw here Richard? You are > > talking with people who know his complete teaching. If you are > trying > > to argue that this one book doesn't discuss all of his teaching, > fine. > > But if you are trying to run the PR party line on a bunch of > trained > > teachers of TM...WTF? > > WTF ? Your arrogance knows no limits.
So Richard claims to know more about TM than MMY, but I claim to know more about his teaching than people who haven't gone through TTC. And I am the one being arrogant? Thanks for the info Nabby, your BS calibration on my meter has been re-set accordingly. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" > > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > Edg wrote: > > > > When Richard the War Monger says, "Which just goes to > > > > prove that, contrary to what Edg implied, Maharishi > > > > didn't talk much about religion, gods, angels or > > > > demons when he composed SBAL," he reveals exactly > > > > that he's a troll and not a person involved in a > > > > dialog. > > > > > > > So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk about > > > "demons"? > > > > What kind of line are you trying to draw here Richard? You are > > talking with people who know his complete teaching. If you are > trying > > to argue that this one book doesn't discuss all of his teaching, > fine. > > But if you are trying to run the PR party line on a bunch of > trained > > teachers of TM...WTF? > > WTF ? Your arrogance knows no limits. >
