Well said. Thanks. **
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "guyfawkes91" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > How many billion USD are in the Brahmananda Saraswati Trust and how > > many generations will it last, in your opinion ? > For an organization dedicated to spreading its ideas in the world the > only asset worth having is credibility. The movement doesn't need any > money at all, it needs credibility. Currently it spends the money on > credibility reduction programs. Money on its own is worthless. Without > people behind it, the TMO is nothing and there are not enough new > people entering the TMO to replace those leaving or dying. The simple > fact that teachers live in poverty while the money in the Brahmananda > Saraswati Trust is used to fund delusional plans and wasteful excesses > is enough to repel new entrants. If teachers have most of their income > taxed to go into the Brahmananda Saraswati Trust, then they won't > teach because they have to make a living. > > It's a measure of how lacking in creative intelligence the present TMO > is that I should have to explain the elementary natural laws of > economics, slowly, using simple words. To everyone one else it's > blindingly obvious. The only reason simple economic realities are not > obvious to people in the movement is that they are protected from > those simple realities by donations. Giving money to the TMO is like > giving to money to a drug addict for their next fix. It prevents them > having to face up to reality and make their own way in the world using > their own abilities. > > The product is good enough that there's a black market in it. Black > markets only happen when something is preventing the normal laws of > economics from connecting suppliers with buyers. Presently the TMO is > standing in the way of people who want to teach connecting up with > people who want to learn. So nature routes around the obstruction. >
