Edg, Darlin' you know I love you. I haven't had time to get into the fray here, though I would have loved to get into a scratching and hair-pulling tussle with Judy about that over-the-top stupid test she posted in which all of Hill's and all of Judy's poison is projected onto Obama, but I just don't have time. I'm preparing to move my household to Minnesota, I'm preparing an art exhibit, and a new teacher from Taiwan is thinking about joining our team--she says she's been looking for me for two years. And I'm finishing a memoir about that famously unbelievable life I've lived so far. I've got a life, you see. I think you're right in your critique of this forum. You may also be right about Judy's more than usual poison-dripping pen as well, but, to me, she's just being normally snarky. That's who she is and that's all she is. If there is another Judy, I haven't met her, though I may have caught a brief glimpse when she was talking to Curtis about music.
--- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds like someone needs a hug. Perhaps in honor > of the Pope's visit > I could give you one of those alter boy in the > Rectory type hugs... > > You know there was no content behind my gay name > nonsense Edg. I was > just running my fingers. > > I haven't noticed anything about Judy but I also > haven't read all the > political posts. I have a third grader's attention > span for political > stuff here. Sorry to disappoint. Judy seems like an > advocate for her > position. My Judy meter is only on when our > interests intersect on a > topic. > > I can relate to both sides of the Obama Clinton > question. That is > the problem I have with discussing politics. Both > Clinton and Obama > have shown me reasons to hate them but also to hope > they can undo some > of the mess we are in. I'm just "bitter" enough to > own a gun, but not > enough to want to go to church. I believe that the > process we use to > elect presidents like America's Got Talent > contestants is totally > stupid but I'm not smart enough to figure out a > different way. I > would never listen to my own opinions about > politics, I'm just not > interested enough to be good at it. > > I dig that you stir the pot here Edg. You aren't a > victim here, I > feel pretty sure you dig it. If I have neglected to > post more atta > boys for good posts, sorry. I try but feel > reluctant to burn up posts > if I have nothing to add. > > I don't think Rory or Jim have been treated poorly > here. They posted > their POVs and people took the time to respond how > they felt about it. > That is all I can expect from FFL. It is a lot > really. I value it. > Your posts included. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Curtis, > > > > And here I was figuring Marek would roast me for > not giving him the > > "heart" accolade. > > > > Can't win. > > > > Okay, okay, I get your point, and it's true, and I > even have seen > > folks hating each other far more than Judy > dislikes Obama, and that > > was the Irish Catholics and the Protestants, so I > should fucking know > > better about the emotions that arise due to > politics and religion. > > > > OTOH, you didn't answer my hot potato question > about whether you think > > Judy's more shrill these days, and that > something's kinda stinky in > > Denmark. Do you lack the guts to merely express > an opinion about her? > > > > And since when does Curtis The Heart add up to a > gay name? Is that > > gay as in "happy" or gay as in "homo" or gay as in > "kids use this term > > to slander anyone and then deny it's a homophobic > usage?" > > > > Can't win, can't win. I post about my hetero > relationship and get > > shit on for being improper and that my kids must > hate me and that I > > smoke dope. I post about the immorality of > hitting on young girls by > > old men, and I get shit on for being some sort of > slavering guy in the > > back row who wishes he had the courage to maraud > like Turq says it's > > okay to do. I scourge a War Monger troll for his > complete lack of > > heart, and I get shit on for my language being > over the top -- when > > actually I could be much more raw when it comes to > describing carnage. > > I refrained from doing so for, among others here, > YOUR SAKE, Curtis, > > cuz you don't need me fleshing out some image in > your mind about dead > > kids on the side of a road -- but the War Monger > sure does. > > > > Can't win. No matter the POV, someone here is > ready to take a dump. > > Even loving God is grounds for a questioning of > one's sanity by some > > snarkmeister like Knob or Off. And praising folks > doesn't cut it > > either, cuz if you say anything nice, you'll be > punished for it later > > when it's brought up out of context -- like > suddenly I was assigned a > > tee shirt because I was tussling with Judy and > was, what?, of all > > things, placed on the same side of the fence as > Turq? As if. I'm not > > on either side of any imagineered fence, but > polarizing bastards are > > cockroaching out of the woodwork for any > statement. > > > > It reminds me of something. > > > > Hmmmm, oh, yeah, Hillary's SLIMY tactics, and > Turq's run for the hills > > if caught red-handed stupid, and the War Monger's > > simply-not-doing-dialog when carnage is brought > up. > > > > I've been very rough with my language in posting > here, and yet, show > > me the fight I started -- very few times if at > all. I simply pose a > > POV and the attacks upon my personality start > raining down, and then I > > attack back. > > > > And, again I say, I've posted a ton of very good > stuff here and gotten > > zilch for a conversation about any of it -- > including from you, > > Curtis. Seems like mostly only "bad stuff" is > allowed here if one > > wants to get a dialog going. Try praising > anything -- > > A.N.Y.T.H.I.N.G. and watch the envy rise like lava > intent on complete > > annihilation. > > > > If Jim or Rory were truly enlightened -- and > everyone here pretty much > > says there's no way to tell such things -- but if > they really were > > enlightened, think of the way they've been handled > here. The highest > > yogi I ever heard of could form a completely new > universe from > > scratch, gods included, and HE got pissed -- what > to say about poor > > Rory and Jim's ability to "take abuse from such > low creeps? > > > > And, Angela, maybe you could get L.B. to say why > he took off and see > > if he can dare to tell a truth about the "scene" > here. I wasn't here > > when he left -- did he leave a note explaining? > > > > This place drives out the decent folks in short > order. Only warriors > > can carve a niche, and some days, I just don't > want to do the > > rationalizations needed to continue to post here > in this den of a > > poisonous, spite-filled, envious, small, gang of > no-life emotionally > > abusive thugs. > > > > If anyone took offense by the above paragraph, it > was you I was > > talking about. If you want to defend a POV that > FFL has some really > > outstanding merit as a community of deep thinkers, > then have at me, > > and perhaps I'll recant that paragraph, but good > luck doing so if you > > come at me with the typical ugliness that's puked > here daily. > > > > And, Curtis, I was NOT talking about you so much > above, though some of > === message truncated === Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
