--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All those statements sound true to me.

Ah, so their being out of context wasn't the
problem after all.

(I gather this is the first time you saw them;
you never actually took the quiz on her Web
site, right?)

Do you acknowledge that they're attacks on her
character?



> 
> 
> 
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela
> > Mailander 
> > <mailander111@> wrote:
> > >
> > > CONTEXT, Judy.  Those statements are all taken out
> > of
> > > context.
> > 
> > Oh, please provide the context of one or two of the
> > statements and show how the context puts a different
> > light on them.  Just one or two. Just one, even.
> > 
> > For your convenience, here they are:
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton is "literally willing to do anything
> > to win."
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton is attempting to "deceive the
> > American people."
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton has a secret 20-year plan to become
> > president.
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton is a calculating, poll-tested,
> > divisive figure.
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton is "one of the most secretive
> > politicians in
> > America."
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton's campaign is "playing politics with
> > war."
> > 
> > John McCain is seen as more honest and trustworthy
> > than Hillary 
> > Clinton.
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton is dishonest.
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton is "a monster."
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton is "not being straight with the
> > American people."
> > 
> > Said of Hillary: "The American people are not going
> > to elect a 
> > president that they do not trust."
> > 
> > Hillary Clinton "consistently" and "deliberately"
> > misleads the 
> > American people.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- authfriend <jstein@> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela
> > > > Mailander 
> > > > <mailander111@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Edg, Darlin' you know I love you.  I haven't
> > had
> > > > time
> > > > > to get into the fray here, though I would have
> > > > loved
> > > > > to get into a scratching and hair-pulling
> > tussle
> > > > with
> > > > > Judy about that over-the-top stupid test she
> > > > posted in
> > > > > which all of Hill's and all of Judy's poison
> > is
> > > > > projected onto Obama
> > > > 
> > > > So amusing how folks are calling the quiz
> > "stupid"
> > > > and "bogus," without ever being able to say
> > *why*
> > > > it's stupid and bogus.
> > > > 
> > > > In fact, the only "poison" in it came *from the
> > > > Obama
> > > > campaign*.
> > > > 
> > > > I think the Obamabots here are trying very hard
> > to
> > > > deal with the cognitive dissonance between the
> > > > saintly image and the reality, and they ain't
> > doing
> > > > so well.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Send instant messages to your online friends 
> > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>


Reply via email to