shempmcgurk wrote: > If elected, both Hillary and Barack say they'll put up the income tax > rates for the rich. > > Yet, according to the statistics at the following site > http://tinyurl.com/3cquum <http://tinyurl.com/3cquum> the rich are, by > ANY objective standard of measurement, already paying far more than > their share. Yes, we should tax the very rich out of existence. The foul their nests anyway and have royally screwed up the planet. Who needs an estate worth any more than twelve million dollars anyway? Insane greedy bastards, that's who? That leaves plenty of room in the economy for anyone who worships wealth to achieve some of it but not uber wealth.
- [FairfieldLife] Should the rich pay MORE income tax? shempmcgurk
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay MORE inco... boo_lives
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay MORE ... shempmcgurk
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay M... boo_lives
- RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the ri... Rick Archer
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the r... boo_lives
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay MORE ... sandiego108
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay M... new . morning
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich p... new . morning
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the r... new . morning
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Should the rich pay MORE inco... Bhairitu
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay MORE ... Richard J. Williams
- [FairfieldLife] is inequality a good thing? claudiouk
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay MORE inco... amarnath
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Should the rich pay MORE inco... bob_brigante