Curtis wrote: > I don't believe that humans know that their > silent self is the basis of creation just > because if can feel like that is true. > What kind of assumptions would you need to entertain in order to believe that there is a 'creation' - since it has been established that there is in fact, no 'science of creative intelligence'?
What epistemology, theory of knowledge, would you cite to indicate that things or events were created? Doesn't the idea of a creation infer that there must have been a creator, an intelligent designer? 1:1 Neither from itself nor from another, Nor from both, Nor without a cause, Does anything whatever, anywhere arise. Mu-lamadhyamakaka-rika: http://tinyurl.com/666v3s
