[FairfieldLife] Re: Notes from Satsang Fairfield

[sandiego108]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>  Doesn't the idea of a creation
> > infer that there must have been a creator, an
> > intelligent designer?
> 
> Absolutely not.  This is completely fallacious.  There can be a
> primacy of existence itself without the need for a creator.  If this
> fallacy was valid you would need to imagine a creator for the creator
> in an infinite regress.  I stop at creation itself without the need 
to
> imagine a creator.
> 
Since you are the primary filter through which all input flows, 
couldn't it be said that since you are the perceiver, you are the 
creator also? No POV expressed here, but curious about *your* 
thinking...