> > The dogma that the enlightened person's actions are > "perfect" is one thing.
Since Curtis is collecting diagrams -- and btw, a collection of such would make a great book-- can we have a diagram showing how any relative thing, like actions, can be "perfect"? Even if one was an anthropormorphic deist, neither Zeus and Appllo, or Shiva and Varuna would agree in each instance that something was "perfect". How can something be perfect-- in a universal sense -- if not all agree?
