--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sgrayatlarge > <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should a minister, any minister just take Iran's > continual > > > threats > > > > > > > to destroy Israel ligthly? Should Israel just keep silent? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my view Israel's policies have invited hatred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, well willytex has well documented in the past why it is > that > > > you > > > > > would take such a position on a state that is in the majority > > > Jewish. > > > > > > > > > > > > Willytex is a reliable source for "documentation?" I see. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, hopefully, he will read this and will then remind you of > your > > > words from posts past. > > > > > > Until then, why don't you get comfy and put that pointed white > sheet > > > back on? > > > > > > Ha Ha Ha, Magoo. You further reveal your slimy character. > > > > Some years back I erroneously equated the Jewish people and their > > religion with the Israeli government's oppressive policies. That > was a > > mistake as much as equating the policies of the asshole right wing > GOP > > Bush administration with the American people as a whole would be. > > > > I admitted my error and apologized - something that I suspect that > you > > already knew yet you wrote this anyway. > > > So if willytex were to reproduce those posts of your's he wouldn't be > a reliable source of documentation? > > Seems he is and you just confirmed it because when you were called on > it you admitted what you had done. > > Well, we shall see if willytex can come up with anything else, shall > we?
No one can rely on the accuracy of Richard's claims, as you also well know, Magoo. But he's certainly as free to post here as anyone else. Perhaps you'd like to have a review your taste for prostitutes, eh? Do you really want to go there, Magoo?
