> Whether or not this is doublespeak meaning that ladies are > *required* to go to the ladies' dome or not (I wonder, where > are the women supposed to go?)
I think it is for the ladies for whom even the whiff of testosterone would make their headlights go on, which as you know is highly anti-Vedic. (although quite attractive through a silk sari I might add) I swear the movement will be instituting Sharia law in my lifetime. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 18, 2008, at 8:32 AM, feste37 wrote: > > > Delighted to oblige. I would love to go to the celebration today, but > > unfortunately leather belts are not permitted and I need one to hold > > my trousers up. I would hate to embarrass myself in front of the > > ladies on such a dignified occasion. > > You don't need to, feste, you now have the total freedom to embarrass > yourself in front of the men only. :) This just in: > > 1. Announcement for Ladies for Guru Purnima > > It is a delight to announce that the Bagambhrini Golden Dome will > be open > and connected to the Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome for the Guru > Purnima > celebration. > > Any ladies who would like to enjoy the celebration in the Ladies' > Dome are > warmly invited. The connection will be a video connection. > > We would ask that the points mentioned for the Men's Dome apply to the > Ladies' Dome as well (arrival time, dress, etc.). > > If you would like your fruit and flowers to be offered by the Vedic > Pandits, please stop by the Men's Dome on your way to the Ladies' > Dome to be > put them in the offerings receptacles in the lobby. > > Whether or not this is doublespeak meaning that ladies are > *required* to go to the ladies' dome or not (I wonder, where > are the women supposed to go?) it's bound to mean that a few less > ladies will be in the mens' dome. So, courage, feste...sally forth! :) > > Sal >
