--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > If my memory isn't faulty, t'would seem that Judy felt > > > the need to...uh...stretch the truth a bit (if not... > > > dare I say it...actually LIE) in the fervor of one of > > > her "Gotta Trash Barry" moments. I'll be interested to > > > see what she has to say about this claim when she > > > returns. > > > > I don't have anything to say about it, other than > > that of course I stand by it. Unless Barry's > > REEEEEELY REEEEEELY STOOOOOOOPID, he ought to have > > been able to come up with an additional possibility, > > in which what I wrote is 100% accurate and the > > faultiness of his memory is completely irrelevant. > > Ok, I think that there will be no complaint from > anyone here if I characterize Judy as the person > who has most often demanded that people back up > their claims on this forum. It's almost her "trade- > mark." Well, turnabout is fair play. > > Judy, please produce two things to back up the > following claim: > > > We recently lost an > > extremely valuable long-time poster because of > > Barry's nastiness and dishonesty. > > 1. Please supply the name or screen name of the > poster you claim left FFL "because of Barry's > nastiness and dishonesty." > > 2. Please supply documentation that this is the > reason they gave for leaving. If it's a message on > FFL, please give us the message number. If it is > a private email, please ask for permission to repost > that email here verbatim. (Or, when you give us the > person's name, we can simply write to the person and > ask them whether your representation of why they > left FFL is accurate.) > > I'm really curious as to how you will respond to > this, Judy. It really IS "doing a Judy" on YOU, and > "turnabout is fair play." Above you "stand by" the > claim, but with no backup. I think everyone here knows > that if anyone else did that when YOU had challenged > them to back up one of their claims, the next words > out of your mouth would be a variant of, "See...I > told you so...he/she is LYING!"
Actually, usually I just note that the person refuses to back up the claim and let others come to their own conclusions. In this case, I'd have to reveal a private communication, which I'm not going to do. And I can't recall ever having demanded that anybody else do so. > Try as I might, I am unable to substantiate your claim > using the Yahoo Search Engine. How much time have you spent on this so far, Barry? <giggle> <snip> > You made a claim, Judy. And now the only thing you have > to say when that claim is challenged is that you "stand > by it." I suppose we're supposed to take your word for > it, because as you say so often, you "never lie." Exactly. > Uh-huh. Aren't you the person who claimed that if Obama > secured the nomination that as a good Democrat you would > support him fully? Given some of the things you've said > on this forum since and the negative nature of the articles > you repost, I cannot help but assume that either you have > a different definition of what "support" means than I do, > or you have a different definition of what "I never lie" > means than I do. Well, one difference in our definition of "lie," apparently, is that if one changes one's mind for some reason, that doesn't mean what one said to start with was a lie. Oh, and by the way, you've now documented that you're REEEEEELY REEEEEELY STOOOOOOOPID.
