--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > Could it possibly be that all your barbs are nothing > > > > more than *envy*? Could it possibly be that you -- as > > > > an outcast from the TM movement because you have pub- > > > > licly admitted that you've seen Amma and that you > > > > are involved with Benny Hill's (oops...there I go > > > > again...sorry...Benny Creme's) teachings, are here > > > > trying to do "research" to figure out how to handle > > > > your life now that YOU wouldn't be allowed within > > > > 100 feet of any official TM building? > > > > > > From Nabby's post #186359 yesterday, to Curtis: > > > > > > "My standing in the Movement is excellent thank you very > > > much. I have a standing invitation to rejoin Purusha at > > > any moment if I so wish." > > > > > > Which of the two, Nabby or Barry, is lying, do you think? > > > > I don't know whether Nabby would be welcome back on Purusha, but > > it's full of nutters anyway so why not? > > > > Barry wasn't lying he was speculating. > > Ah, no. The speculation concerned why Nabby was posting > here; his status with the movement was stated as if it > were established fact. (And Barry's made such statements > several times previously.)
Yeah, yeah. I couldn't give a toss to be perfectly honest, I just wanted to get my Benny Hill joke in.
