--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Nov 2, 2008, at 11:26 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> > 
> > > In the thread I started titled "a well regulated militia", I 
suggested
> > > that there be "a civilian paramilitary that is just as strong 
as the
> > > regular military" and asked: "Doesn't that sound like a good 
idea?"
> > >
> > > The Obama-bots all chimed in to snicker and say how they're all
> > > opposed: Rick, Bob, Gullible Fool, Vajina, Nelson.
> > >
> > > BUT IT'S BARACK OBAMA WHO IS SUGGESTING A CIVILIAN 
PARAMILITARY!!!!
> > 
> > Actually Obama never used the word paramilitary. You might want 
to  
> > listen to it again. And it's way too brief to hear the context. 
Since  
> > there are no other references, it's hard to know if this quote 
from  
> > months ago actually represents the current policy stand of 
future  
> > President Obama.
> > 
> > More people are killed EVERY YEAR by guns than in all the Iraq 
wars! I  
> > look forward to working together with my representatives, the  
> > democratic senate and President Barack Hussein Obama to force 
new,  
> > stricter gun laws. Together we can stop the slaughter from gun 
nuts. I  
> > think this would be a good use for the secret prisons of the Bush-
 
> > Cheney fascist regime!
> >
>   ++ On the chart that could compare firearms fatalities with
> automobile related ones, would the former even show up?  maybe there
> should be a ban car group?
>


Or how about the reported 650,000 unnecessary deaths each year 
resulting from negligence or improper treatment by AMA-certified 
medical doctors in this country?  

Maybe we should ban doctors...

Reply via email to