--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip] > > It didn't include the word "military," Shemp. And > "force" is a neutral term, as in "labor force." Yes, it did: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." PLUS, he has the word "security" in there to qualify exactly what kind of "force" he was referring to. He didn't say "Social Security Force", Judy, nor did he say "Health Security Force". Bad choice of words on his part.
