--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > > Do you actually believe that Nabby's obvious > > > hatred of things Buddhist (something he is > > > repeating as rote from the Shankaracharya trad- > > > ition) is *balanced*? > > > > > nabby strikes me as a pretty religous person. > > dawn; whats wrong with that ?
absolutely nothing. nor do you seem unbalanced in the least. i think you just poke fun at fundamentalist ways, in favor of what you have found to be best. that seems to be the personality of this forum in large part. > > I don't hate Buddhism, quite the contrary it is the religion which is > the closests to Maharishi and Mr. Creme. Maharishi always spoke very > fondly of The Buddha and obviously held Him in high regard. And the > Guru's of countless initiates within Tesosophy are Buddhists. > > But it amuses me that this religion, like all the other organized > religions, have lost the ability to give their followers a direct > experience of Being. i have to agree with you there. So overwhelmingly evidenced by the hateful posts > against the TMO by Buddhists like Vaj and the Turq. > > It is only when this Turq-fellow again and again seek to trash the TMO > and the way the Rajas are dressing by pointing out that they in fact > wear golden crowns I take the liberty to show a few examples of what > Bhuddhists actually put on top of their heads. > > Like this one: Enjoy ! > > [ BHUTAN] > i find the buddhist hats charming and wonderful from a design standpoint, but as dress with any significance, yes it is all rather silly. at least i enjoy challenging the concept.
