--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 
> <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > -snip- 
> > > I still wouldn't vote for her, and there's no
> > > question that she isn't presidential material.
> > > But the sheer meanness with which she's been
> > > attacked is unwarranted and inexcusable.
> > >
> > politics is a dirty business because part of the strategy
> > is always to paint your opposition as untrustworthy and 
> > incompetent. if the democrats had played nice with palin
> > while she was happily drumming up hatred against obama,
> > who knows what would have happened?
> 
> So you're saying that if Republicans are dishonest
> and mean, that justifies Democrats being dishonest
> and mean too?
> 
> Sorry, I can't go along with that. If we can't win
> by attacking the opposition on the basis of its
> *real* deficiencies--and Palin had more than enough--
> why the hell do we think we have the right to ask
> people to vote for Democrats? How are we any better
> than the Republicans?
>
> > to call the democrats' actions unwarranted and inexcusable,
> > and attributing those same actions to meanness is naive.
> 
> I'm referring (as I suspect you're well aware) to
> crap like calling her a "bimbo" and worse, and
> pretending she's stupid, and ccusing her of being
> a "thief" because of the clothing purchases, and a 
> "religious fanatic," when she's obviously none of
> the above.
>
you suspect me of things which are not mine. i don't condone name 
calling, and was not focused on that. when i look at who is doing 
what to whom on the national political scene, i stay away from blogs 
and clearly partisan sources, and try to see how each party comes 
across to the average voter in for example, nebraska or new york or 
ohio. 

i am talking about legitimate or should i say -more- legitimate 
attempts to discredit her, like the clothes fiasco, or her dumb 
answers to questions. now it may be only a partial truth to 
emphasize those things to make her look worse than she actually is 
(though i personally doubt it), but that's politics.


Reply via email to