> No whip? No gun? No cattle prods? > > Sal OK, skip the Sidha dresses, you're going straight to black leather or "midnight" latex.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Alex Stanley wrote: > > >>> On Jan 5, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote: > >>>> I just wonder what beliefs people hold. There's > >>>> a strong possibility that these people carry some > >>>> cognitive dissonance, and I wonder how they > >>>> reconcile it. What are the options? > >>>> > >>>> 1. My experience tells me my program is good, > >>>> but my experiences don't corroborate that group- > >>>> dynamics-of-consciousness thing. > >>>> > >>>> 2. I believe in the Maharishi Effect, but the > >>>> hired meditators will cover for me. > >>>> > >>>> 3. I went out of my way to support the TM > >>>> organization for many, many years because I > >>>> believe in its goals, but I have nothing left > >>>> to give. > >>>> > >>>> There are other possibilities, of course. > >>>> > >>>> Doug suggests that people are boycotting the > >>>> domes because they have ethical objections to > >>>> the organization, but that explanation doesn't > >>>> sound persuasive to me. Hence my conjecture > >>>> about what the real motives may be. > >>> > >>> Doesn't sound persuasive to me either--I mean, > >>> the idea that someone could still get into the Domes > >>> but would actually make another choice is just > >>> incomprehensible. These people should be hounded, > >>> HOUNDED, I say, until they divulge their real reasons. > >> > >> Sal, I vote that you be appointed the official Grand Inquisitor of > >> Non-Dome Attendance. For a uniform, I suggest sensible shoes and one > >> of those frumpy Sidha dresses from the 1980s. > > No whip? No gun? No cattle prods? > > Sal >
