Hope. Change. Believe. Sacrifice. Coming Together. wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jan-Åke Ingvar Jönsson
> <transcendentalcosmicbl...@yahoo.se> wrote:
>
>> Have a look at these Obama-facts and statements:
>>
>> Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor:
>> www.davidicke.com/obama
>>
>> Obama-lies, which Obama did you vote for?:
>> http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=5630
>>
>> The Obama Deception:
>> http://www.obamadeception.net/
>>
>>
>
> Very good. Now if only I can get Gmail filters to make Bhairitu's
> posts invisible.
>
You can't hide from me by changing your handle. :-P
> A quick history of Obama. Ran unopposed for the Illinois legislature
> because of constant challenging of other candidate's legitimate claims
> to be on the ballot. Soon after ran for US Senator. Held no position
> of distinction in the US Senate during his single term. Quickly
> started running for US president. While campaigning, refused to
> reveal his birth certificate, resulting in many law suits around the
> country still pending which challenge the legality of his election to
> the presidency. Also refused to provide school, college, law school
> transcripts and work product. No evidence that Obama actually wrote
> any law opinions or did any publishable legal writing despite being
> head of the law review. No significant legislation proposed in the
> Senate. In short, no real experience in government. No details in
> his record to have to campaign in spite of. Spoke about redoing the
> NAFTA during his campaign. Of all the hundreds of things he's
> "promised" since becoming President, the only thing he's done about
> NAFTA was to go to Canada and tell the Canadians how much he loved
> them.
>
> Just the kind of man we needed as ink blotch that we can all project
> our malcontent with the current government on. Pretty much another
> JFK, who's only real contribution in politics was to get killed in
> office and therefore get people teary eyed about the hype that wasn't
> any more than that.
Okay, so who would you suggest that would be better (this should be
interesting)?
