--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And I do believe you have made a good point about my oversimplifying > the monolithic nature of big media -- I was a bit surprised to see > this statement by founder of USA Today: > <snip> > > Neuharth added, in his weekly column Friday in the newspaper he > founded: "The crucial difference between Vietnam and Iraq is that > there is no Cronkite to call Bush's bluff. Without a strong, trusted, > non-political voice, too many of us remain Bush-blinded. Bush tried > keeping the wool over our eyes again Tuesday on national TV by > repeatedly tying Iraq to 9/11. That charge is as phony as his > discredited prewar claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass > destruction." <snip>
So this brings me to the real question -- If Neuharth is correct, WHY is there no "strong, trusted, non-political voice" in the media today, if not because of a relatively complete sell-out to the M-I complex? Again, this is not a rant, just a question. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
