--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > One of the things I've found most fascinating in > all of this post-concert "I'm important because > something I was once associated with is in the > news" idiocy is the continuing tendency on the > part of the TMO and TMers to not *CARE* who the > praise comes from as long as it's praise. I would > bet that if they'd gotten a "good review" of the > concert and its goals from Adolf Hitler they'd > be putting that in their press releases, too. > > But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far. At least > the great Roger Ebert is not giving him a pass > on being an idiot. Here is his reaction to Bill's > latest "hit list." The last line should be read > over and over and over by Nabby, Judy, and Off. > That's their reaction to this concert hype to a "T." >
Actually, Bill O'Reilly has been getting a LOT of flack from Catholic and other conservative religious blogs about his stance on TM. Which helps convince me of what I've long suspected: he really IS semi-independent from Faux News: They just tolerate him because he happens to agree with their editorial stance so much of the time. L
