--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > [...] > > He showed that it was possible to do a literary interpretation of western > > QM and vedic cosmology and cross-polinate one field from the other. > > I'm not convinced he managed it at all. This has got to be the most important > question that will be asked about vedic "science": Whether > or not it's possible to have objectively verifiable knowledge of fundamental > levels of reality from a subjective source ie: meditation.
Shrugs. Its anb interesting question, but its not what I claimed--at least not directly. Lawson
