--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > eta u tye praty adR^ishran pradoShaM taskaraa iva |
> >
> > This is way "interesting": in the pada-paaTha text the above
> > line goes like this (in UTF-8, as "opposed" to ITRANS in the
> > above saMhitaa-paaTha text):
> >
> > ete | oá¹ iti | tye | prati | adá¹Åran | pra-doá¹£am | taskarÄḥ-iva |
> >
> > Have no idea, why 'u' changes to 'om' in the pada-paaTha... :0
> > (Tha 'iti' is some kind of metatextual[?] comment, or stuff.)
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/n7d59r
> >
>
> Schucks, the 'om' is prolly a typo, because in his comment
> on Rk I 35 verse 6, Macdonnel sez:
>
> The pcl. 'u' is always written in the Pada text as a long
> vowel and nasalized: uuM iti.
>
> -------------------
>
> saMhitaa:
>
> ihá braviitu yá u tác cíketat
>
> pada:
>
> iha | braviitu | yaH | uuM iti | tat | ciketat ||
>
Well, Kawa Bunga
