And you verify those sources for accuracy? Or do you just beleive her becuase you like what she says?
--- On Thu, 8/6/09, do.rflex <do.rf...@yahoo.com> wrote: From: do.rflex <do.rf...@yahoo.com> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maddow: Right Wing Mob Mentality to Disrupt Health Care Town Halls To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009, 5:23 PM --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@ ...> wrote: > > I'm curious Reflux, how often do you bother to verify Maddow's *facts*and to > what extent ? You don't... do you? > Rachel provides the sources for those facts as she reports them - which you'd have noticed if it really was important to you. > As for loonies, they are out there. Remember Bush was *selected not elected* Bush was AWOL, Bush was a cocaine addict, 911 was an inside job, it was a missile, not a jet, that hit the Pentagon, Blood for oil, Bush is stealing Iraqi oil,Bush is getting ready to suspend the constitution and declare marshal law, etc. You fell for all that crap, didn't you. I bet Rachel Maddow did also. > It isn't possible to reason with the remaining 20% dead-ender fringe. They're simply not capable of it. ~~ The Incredible Shrinking GOP: Only 20 Percent Self-Identify As Republican ~~ = = Earlier this week a Washington Post poll made a big splash because it found that only 21 percent self-identify as Republicans. The abysmally low number got pundits and reporters talking about whether the GOP is shrinking to the point of irrelevance. Now we have another poll that finds that the number of self-identified Republicans has dropped even lower: 20 percent. Here are the key numbers, buried in the internals of the new NBC/WSJ poll: - Thirteen percent identify themselves as a "strong Republican"; seven percent as a "not very strong Republican." Total: Twenty percent. http://snipurl. com/ov48x [theplumline_ whorunsgov_ com] > --- On Thu, 8/6/09, do.rflex <do.rf...@.. .> wrote: > > > From: do.rflex <do.rf...@.. .> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maddow: Right Wing Mob Mentality to Disrupt > Health Care Town Halls > To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com > Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009, 2:36 PM > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@ ...> wrote: > > > > And Maddow is ...objective? > > The difference is that Maddow backs up her reports with verifiable facts. The > wingnuts simply make stuff up - like FEMA concentration camps for Obama's > political enemies and mandatory service for young people where they'll be > subject to 're-education' indoctrination to turn them agqainst their parents, > Obama is a Muslim born in Kenya, etc., etc. > > There's a whole boat-load of easily lead gullible idiots who believe crap > like that that. Are you one of them, Dixon? > > > > > --- On Thu, 8/6/09, do.rflex <do.rflex@ .> wrote: > > > > > > From: do.rflex <do.rflex@ .> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maddow: Right Wing Mob Mentality to Disrupt > > Health Care Town Halls > > To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com > > Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009, 1:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > All you have to do is Google* Inside Obama's Acorn* by Stanly Kurtz. But > > > there are many others. > > > > > > > The correct spelling of his name is Stanley, and he's a not remotely > > objective. He's a flaming right wing nutbag Obama hater. > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 8/5/09, do.rflex <do.rflex@ .> wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: do.rflex <do.rflex@ .> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maddow: Right Wing Mob Mentality to Disrupt > > > Health Care Town Halls > > > To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com > > > Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 4:44 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@ ...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > What's funny about this is, these are Obama tactics coming back to bite > > > > him in his own ass. He's the community organizer that helps groups like > > > > ACORN do this very thing. > > > > > > > > > > Let's see you back up your claim, Mr Dixon. > > > > > > First, show that ACORN uses the tactics as described in the video report. > > > > > > Second, show that Obama "helps groups like ACORN do this very thing." > > > > > > BTW, do you think the 'South' will rise again? > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 8/5/09, shempmcgurk <shempmcgurk@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > From: shempmcgurk <shempmcgurk@ ...> > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maddow: Right Wing Mob Mentality to > > > > Disrupt Health Care Town Halls > > > > To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com > > > > Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 4:22 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@ .> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rachel Maddow - guest Chris Hayes on the Town Hall disrupters > > > > > > > > > > Watch: http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=17PLsr0- Hs4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > BillyG just presented the results of a poll showing that 45% of > > > > Americans are satisfied with their health care. > > > > > > > > If that's the case, I can't imagine that that is entirely "right wing", > > > > first of all. So if there is going to be a "mob", as you say, that > > > > shows up at this event, why would it be described as "right wing" > > > > necessarily? Democrats and left-wingers may very well be part of that > > > > 45% and I suspect that they are and, indeed, make up a hefty part of it. > > > > > > > > No one should disrupt public meetings outside the bounds of acceptable > > > > modes of protest. But people who are counter to a certain position have > > > > every right to organise and show up at these things. I personally don't > > > > like it when that happens and would prefer that it stays civil but it > > > > is, after all, a "town hall" meeting. > > > > > > > > What bugs me is Bill Maher's show where there IS a mob mentality in his > > > > studio audience which openly snickers, cat-calls, and drowns out > > > > right-of-center voices on his show. I would much prefer that Maher keep > > > > the exact same format he has but do it WITHOUT a studio audience. > > > > > > > > > >
