--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcg...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG" <wgm4u@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" <compost1uk@> wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "But do these revelations justify the sceptics' > > > > claims that this is "the final nail in the coffin" > > > > of global warming theory?(8,9) > > > > > > > > Not at all. > > > > > > > > They damage the credibility of three or four > > > > scientists. They raise questions about the integrity > > > > of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of > > > > evidence. To bury manmade climate change, a far wider > > > > conspiracy would have to be revealed." > > > > > > > > ~~ George Monbiot > > > > > Well, yes - except that the "three or four" are very much > > > key players in what is actually a surprisingly small > > > field. > > > > Indeed, the sanctum sanctorum of the international global warming cabal, > > now in jeopardy of loosing their reputations, grants and power! > > > > > AT THE VERY LEAST what must now happen is that AGW skeptics must get a chair > at the table. No more censoring. No more science-fascism. > > BOTH sides of the debate are now going to be heard. > > And the third side as well, which is catching on: that more CO2 in the > atmosphere is a GOOD thing.
Right on Shemp, at a minimum it must be opened to both pro AND con, in spite of Pope's comment, the debate is over!
