You two fellows are either trolling for entertainment or blind ideologues in denial.
Either way, it's a waste of time to bother with you. People like you and flat-earthers are in the same category. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcg...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > Bananas. > > > > The IPCC represents an overwhelming global consensus body of science > > based on the research of thousands of scientists from around the world. > > > > From their website: > > > > "Thousands of scientists from all over the world contribute to the work > > of the IPCC on a voluntary basis. Review is an essential part of the > > IPCC process, to ensure an objective and complete assessment of current > > information." > > > [snip] > > > > But science is neither a democracy nor a consensus. > > A million "scientists" can agree on something. If the facts are contrary to > what they say, the consensus ain't worth a hill of beans. > > Indeed, the consensus can be "overwhelming" as we are told ad infinitum. But > agreeing on something doesn't make it "fact"; agreeing happens in committees > and in parliaments (hopefully). It is NOT in the realm of science which is a > dictatorship of provable, repeatable facts. > > Scientific "fact" is when you postulate something and it can be repeatable > and predictable, neither of which has or is happening with the religion of > global warming. >
