--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <dhamiltony...@...> wrote: > > The 'Maharishi Effect' establishes a new formula for the > creation of an ideal society, free from crime and problems.
Might I point out that "establishing a formula" does not make that formula true, or make it have anything to do with reality? For example, I could "establish a formula" for recurring behavior on Fairfield Life, as follows: -Jv + Jphh = 10 * JMSBS where Jv = a temporary "Judy victim," someone who buys her pretense of being an "authority" about anything to the point that they believe she's worth debating something with. -Jv = When one of these "Judy victims" comes to his or her senses and realizes she isn't worth wasting spit on, much less time. Jphh = Judy publicly humiliates herself by throwing tantrums and trying anything she can think of to taunt or insult the former "Judy victim" back *into* debating with her. JMSBS = Judy Must Stalk Barry Syndrome. In layman's language, the formula states that every time someone gets suckered into a "debate" with Judy and then figures out she's a nutcase and not worth their time, she goes crazy and embarrasses herself publicly trying to "get them back," but then when she can't, she increases her hatred of the dreaded Barry tenfold, blames him for it, and increases her stalking and demonizing of him by a similar factor of ten. I would suggest that there is FAR more statistical evidence for the accuracy and truth of this formula in the archives of Fairfield Life (think Ruth, do.rflex, and now Richard, to name only three) than there is or ever has been for the Maharishi Effect "formula." :-)
