--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 12:29 AM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More on "Raja Ram" > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 24, 2010, at 8:07 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > have that. I'll hang in there with the Kingster > > > > > and wish his 3-1/2-year-old luck in "school." :-) > > > > > > > 3.5 years in old enough in the US to be in pre-school, > > > and isn't his oldest 5.5? So she'd be entering K anyway. > > > > One more time, folks: The only mention of the kids' > > schooling came from Hagelin, and what he waid was that > > MMY wanted the marriage kept secret until the OLDEST > > was in school. That would be the 5-1/2-year-old. > > Wrong, it came from an unauthorized mail posted here by Rick Archer that, to > my knowledge has never been confirmed by the Movement. Neither this nor the > Paris-rumour. > The Paris rumor was unofficial, but there were two official things about the > marriage, kids, and secrecy posted - one from Hagelin, one from Bevan.
I know you claim the mails are from Hagelin and Bevan, but the fact is that they could have been written by anyone with a computer and a keyboard. Until there is an official acknowledgement of the happenings you claim to know of there is no harm, particularily knowing your previous rather liberal attitude towards facts, in remaining unperturbed.
