--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
> > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 12:29 AM
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More on "Raja Ram"
> >  
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 24, 2010, at 8:07 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > > > have that. I'll hang in there with the Kingster
> > > > > > and wish his 3-1/2-year-old luck in "school." :-)
> > > > > 
> > > > 3.5 years in old enough in the US to be in pre-school,
> > > > and isn't his oldest 5.5? So she'd be entering K anyway.
> > > 
> > > One more time, folks: The only mention of the kids'
> > > schooling came from Hagelin, and what he waid was that
> > > MMY wanted the marriage kept secret until the OLDEST
> > > was in school. That would be the 5-1/2-year-old.
> > 
> > Wrong, it came from an unauthorized mail posted here by Rick Archer that, to
> > my knowledge has never been confirmed by the Movement. Neither this nor the
> > Paris-rumour.
> > The Paris rumor was unofficial, but there were two official things about the
> > marriage, kids, and secrecy posted - one from Hagelin, one from Bevan.
> 
> I know you claim the mails are from Hagelin and Bevan, but the fact is that 
> they could have been written by anyone with a computer and a keyboard.
> Until there is an official acknowledgement of the happenings you claim to 
> know of there is no harm, particularily knowing your previous rather liberal 
> attitude towards facts, in remaining unperturbed.
>
Nabby.   People who work at the higher levels of the TMO all believe that Raja 
Raam is married with children. They heard it in conversations with Bevan and 
John.  The TMO may never send out an official pronouncement.They may treat it 
as a private matter that does not require an announcement.- especially if Raja 
Raam continues in his role as King.  The analogy isn't great, but it is kind of 
like the CEO of a business might get married, but they would not send an 
announcement to shareholders, or employees since it is part of the CEO's 
private life and should not interfere with his job performance.


Reply via email to