--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes...@...> wrote:
I know why I never learn though, it's because I'm an optimist. I like to believe that one day I'll get you to understand a contrary viewpoint. Well said! You expressed the odd mystery of interacting with him perfectly. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > But, if thoughts are not part of the physical > > > > world, then what are they a part of? That's the > > > > question, and it's has nothing to do with ethics, > > > > religious or otherwise. > > > > > > Hugo: > > > Selling prayers that don't work for large sums > > > and using quantum physics as justification > > > sounds like an pretty ethical problem to me. > > > > > That's where you got mixed up - it is unethical to > > make fun of other people's spiritual path. There > > are no ethics in quantum physics. > > > > You are acting like the thought police. I see no > > harm in any group of people wanting to send out good > > vibes to the rest of the community. Why would anyone, > > other than a fascist, want to criticize that? > > My mistake is that I never learn. Time after time > people tell me (and you) that there aint no point > trying to communicate with the willtex. It's like > you don't want to understand someones POV, either > that or you can't bring yourself to admit there > may be an ethical problem in lying about something > to make money. Aint no positive vibes in some of the > TMOs money making schemes that I've seen. Telling > people yagyas have a foundation in QP is highly > dubious behaviour. > > You can't say if you disagree or even understand, > but just go of on a surreal tangent inventing things > you want me (and others) to be so you can feel all > smug and self-righteous. Or are you just a troll > with no life to speak of outside the "Golden Domes > of Pure Knowledge", can't get his kicks without > creating non-existent arguments. Weird I call it. > I know why I never learn though, it's because I'm > an optimist. I like to believe that one day I'll > get you to understand a contrary viewpoint. >
