MMY was somewhat notorious for not paying attorneys, for always trying to find a way to wiggle out of any commitment made involving an attorney.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of Joe > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 1:18 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Let's hear it for Jerry+Any particular question > lingering for the last 30 ye > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Joe" <geezerfreak@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > That maharishi could dump someone who had been so > > > incredibly important to the TMO, someone who had > > > followed his every command and who helped bring untold > > > thousands into the fold.....that told me that I should > > > now view Maharishi's behavior as I would any other man. > > > > For those of us who weren't privy to the inner workings > > of the movement, what *was* the ostensible reason for > > dumping Jerry? I remember something vague about his not > > being in favor of the TM-Sidhis course, but I have no > > idea how reliable that was. > > > Getting ready to fly (using a plane) in a few but the short story is that > Jerry was made the fall guy for the loss of the TM in schools court case. > MMY totally hung him out to dry over this. > I heard that Jerry wanted to fight it and MMY wanted to drop it so MMY was > pissed when the movement fought it, lost, then had to pay lawyers a bundle > anyway. I heard MMY told Jerry to stiff the lawyers, and booted him when he > paid them anyway. But this is all rumor. I wasn't in a position to know. >
