On May 23, 2010, at 6:14 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > This is pathology, reinforced and replicated by the > pathological. In my opinion, of course. As proof, > might I suggest that none of the other participants > in the discussion -- on FFL or, as in this case, from > BATGAP -- would be able to include the second sentence > above in their responses. This is the first of fifteen > Ravirants today to that forum.
> -- In buddhaatthegasp...@yahoogroups.com, "Jim" <jim@> wrote: >> >> Hi Rick, >> >> Thanks for the idea. I don't feel any particular desire to do >> that [get in touch with Ravi physically and in "real life" if >> he ever returns to the West Coast] - he seems nice enough, but >> I don't see much else in common. >> >> If you are concerned for his state of mind, don't sweat it. He >> is just expressing a lot of energy. >> >> --- In buddhaatthegasp...@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" rick@ wrote: >>> >>> Jim, if Ravi gets back to the west coast, perhaps there would be >>> some valuen the two of you getting together. You think? >> My personal opinion--Jim's as nuts as Ravi, he's just got better defenses. Sal
