authfriend wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozg...@...> wrote: > >> authfriend wrote: >> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> authfriend wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <fflmod@> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I just assumed it was someone hijacking card's email address. >>>>>> As far as I know, the real card's name is not John, he does >>>>>> not live in SF, he lives in one of those Scandanavian contries >>>>>> where paying more than half your money in taxes actually gets >>>>>> you something. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Good lord. Card was quoting a spam post from some blog he >>>>> reads that was made, complete with link, by Jon of San >>>>> Francisco. Card thought it was funny. That's why the >>>>> subject heading is "ROFLOL!" >>>>> >>>>> I mean, really...how difficult is that to figure out?? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> A blog? ROTLOL! Perhaps you should go up the URL to the >>>> home page of Adult Finder really is. Then you'll know that >>>> the "blog" is really an "ad." >>>> >>> Bhairitu, please just read what I wrote again, with >>> attention this time. >>> >> I READ your post the first time. And in your OCD interest >> of being "perfect" suggested you actually find out what that >> website does. How's the heat in NJ these days? >> > > OK, I guess you also need to read what I was responding to. > > The point is that card was quoting something he found on > a blog that he thought was funny. He doesn't have malware > on his system, nor did somebody hijack his email address > (at least, not that his post indicates).
I responded to Card's post and deleted via the web my response because it included the link and reposted a post sans link. John quoted my post before it disappeared. But I would tend to agree that malware wouldn't have put that subject. Card just wasn't thinkin'. I was just saying that people should trace back up the link to see what the site really is. It's well known around the Internet and many laugh because they figure that the images there don't really belong to the people advertising but taken from a catalog of models (which of course Penthouse would own a lot of).
