Of course. That's no big deal for me. I just
like to think it that way...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> Another possibility, Card, is that there is
> no such thing as "support of Nature," and
> that the very concept is something made up
> by people who aren't comfortable with Shit
> Happening That They Can't Explain.
>
> In my opinion, everyone in human history has
> had exactly the same "support of Nature."
> That is, none.
>
> Shit just happens, and those who like to pose
> as knowing WHY shit happens make up theories
> like "support of Nature" to pretend they're
> not just as clueless as everyone else.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > One of the "problems" might be that Mrs. Palin, like Hitler, could
> > have, for some peculiar reason, "the support of Nature", at least
> > for a while.
> >
> > In Hitler's case one of the "proofs" is that he seemed to survive
> > several (seventeen?) assassination attempts?
>
