--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <wg...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > BillyG, you are so utterly useless. There's better > > evidence that Loughner is a right-wing crackpot than > > that he's a left-wing crackpot. > > Since you admit he's a crackpot, what difference does > it make? NONE!
I don't "admit" that he's a crackpot, I *assert* that he's a crackpot (and have done so almost from the beginning). And I assert that you're worse than useless, you're thoroughly dishonest, for quoting the first paragraph of my post but not the next two: "But for a person who is clinically mentally ill, which very much appears to be the case with Loughner, partisan politics is basically irrelevant. "In any case, his classmate knew him back in 2007. People change--especially crazy people. What we know of him since then, from his YouTube text-videos and his MySpace and Facebook pages, is that his thinking was too incoherent to represent any particular political position." In other words: *I* was the one pointing out that it made no difference--as I have almost from the beginning-- in response to *your* chortling over having found a classmate of Loughner's from three years ago who thought he was a lefty. Now that you find there's evidence he was a righty, all of a sudden it's you who's demanding to know what difference it makes. God doesn't like hypocrites or liars, BillyG. And you're both.