--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2005, at 12:58 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > Of course, there's debate about whether or not chakras are part of > > the Vedic tradition in the first place. I want to see research on > > what each of these "types" of witnessing etails, physiologically > > speaking... > > There is very little that remains from the "Vedic tradition--in fact > most of what the TMO/M. promotes as "Vedic" is not "Vedic" at all.
How so? > Chakras in the popular usage comes primarily from the first translation > of the "Sat Chakra Nirupana", a relatively recent text. > > I doubt there would be any measurable physiological correlation with > our current level of technology, although these different states do > correspond do specific styles of meditation, all of which ARE being > studied and do possess certain styles of neurological epxression. > Ultimately their goal is relax beyond dualistic "witnessing" and simply > to be able to integrate the state of non-dual presence whether with > thoughts or without thoughts or whatever. I cannot see how you'd > "measure" that. States of consciousness have physiological signatures, regardless of mental "content." To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
