Om, those upholstered chairs in the front row. Slide 16.  Ego?  What kind of a 
donation might it take to get one of those out front of everyone else?  
Buddhists beware, TM dismantled a movement using chairs like those too.  
Forewarned is forearmed. Look where TM is now.
-Buck 


>
> > http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/20/close_encounters_of_the_buddhist_kind
> >
> 
> Amazing photos really.
> 
> If their goal was to create practicing meditators it
> seems they did pretty well.  In forty years, 
> how many million meditators?  In a country
> Of 67-68 million people.  2 in 'bout 70 people?
> 
> TM taught about a million (900K) during a time a few years ago
> in America.  Back when the population was under 300 million.  
> 1 in 300.
> 
> -B
>  
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > This Slate.com article is for Nabby. I figure he'll really
> > like the familiarity of a cult that stages elaborately 
> > choreographed rallies, has an evangelist vision that seeks 
> > to promote a "world morality restoration project" and a 
> > program that encourages hundreds of thousands of children 
> > to improve "positive moral behavior," and raises billions 
> > of dollars to spread its message. So far, it sounds a lot 
> > like the David Lynch Foundation, doesn't it? Besides, this 
> > cult has a headquarters that looks like a giant UFO. Nabby 
> > will like that.
> > 
> > But wait. The cult is Buddhist. Nabby *won't* like that.  :-)
> > 
> > Hint, Nabs...neither do I. Talk about missing the whole 
> > point of Buddhist teaching. Icky as hell. Makes my skin
> > crawl. But neat photos, so check out the slideshow-style
> > article for them if nothing else:
> > 
> > http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/20/close_encounters_of_the_buddhist_kind
> > 
> > For the record, Southeast Asian Buddhism (this cult is
> > Thai) has always been to Buddhism like Southern Baptists
> > are to Christianity. Rules, rules, rules...everything 
> > revolves around the Vinaya, a Big Book 'O Rules that 
> > almost certainly was created centuries after Buddha's 
> > death, and has little to do with his teachings. And 
> > they've definitely turned what Buddha himself said was 
> > *not* a religion into one. As I said, I find it icky. 
> > But YMMV.
> >
>


Reply via email to