[FairfieldLife] Re: Non-replicable Science

[RoryGoff]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote:
>
> ...seems as good a place to intervene, given the future subject matter...Hi 
> Rory! You were writing earlier about science not tracking anymore, or 
> something close, and I have noticed in the past year or so that global 
> climate, politics, and communication have all gone non-linear too. Beyond 
> prediction. Nice to see it catching up with now - lol :-)  
> 
* * * Hi, Jim! Yes, someone else posted that article here (twice apparently), 
and Judy commented on it (the second time, if not also the first); she could 
probably supply the source if the article's original poster(s) are not tracking 
this conversation. IIRC it showed that a number of researchers in various 
fields were finding that their results were no longer replicable, as if Nature 
were actually habituating. "Beyond prediction" is an interesting angle on it, 
and would indeed tickle nicely at the Now, wouldn't it? :-)