Every time you try to leave, they pull you back in!!

--- On Tue, 3/8/11, jpgillam <jpgil...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: jpgillam <jpgil...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Enlightenment Personal?
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 11:10 AM
> I skim over 95 percent of Fairfield
> Life content, but I 
> always pause to read Peter's explanations of why there's 
> no self in cosmic consciousness, despite having read 
> many of them in the past. Funny how I'm always willing 
> to read another one.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> Peter <drpetersutphen@...> wrote:
> >
> > You keep on making this conceptual argument which does
> make sense from a waking state context. But if you have
> clear CC experiences it becomes quite clear there is no
> individuality as a private center of consciousness. This is
> only a neo-advaita trap when people try to argue there is no
> self in waking state. Of course there is a self in waking
> state. There just isn't one in CC. So what happens to this
> relative self in CC? The answer is nothing. It becomes clear
> that the sense of relative self was a delusion. This is why
> the rope and snake metaphor is so powerful. You could argue
> that the snake exists as a concept or belief. But this would
> be like saying from waking state that your dream of a tiger
> was real. Only in the dream is the tiger real. Once you
> shift into waking state, the tiger is no longer real in this
> new context. The same thing happens to the sense of
> individuality in CC. It's not there. There's only
> consciousness which has no relative
> >  measure.
> > 
> > Non-localization is not a conceptual argument that can
> be understood in waking state. It sounds absurd, of course.
> Imagine trying to tell your dream ego that there is no tiger
> as it experiences the tiger chasing it! But it is a
> conceptual tool that helps you in CC.
> > 
> > By the way, I completely agree with you that
> neo-advaita is nonsense, but not for the same reasons you
> argue. Neo-advaita is nonsense because it offers no tools to
> facilitate realization and it takes concepts that make
> plenty of sense in Realization, but make no sense in waking
> state.    
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Or go to: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>     fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
> 
> 
> 


      

Reply via email to