In other words, you've got your story, and no one's going to change for you - lol. There are long discussions about many topics here, but you are blind to many of them in your zeal to remain as a shadow member of the TMO. You can talk about whatever you want of course, though you are sounding like a broken record after so many years. :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > I gotta say Barry, that I find it odd that so much of what > > you see, write, and observe is a reference to the TMO. A > > teacher you observe in a classroom triggers a TMO referral. > > Ducks swimming in a river-trigger a TMO referral. Statement > > from the Dalai Lama statement-triggers a TMO referral. You > > got to wonder, what doesn't trigger a TMO referral. But > > maybe this is the framework from which you view the world. > > Has it ever occurred to you that I'm writing for > a forum of people who *themselves* see the world > as one big Maharishi referral? As I've suggested > before, what else am I going to write about *here*? > > These are people who have spent decades of their > lives seeing the world in terms of one man. They > cannot at this point do otherwise. > > I mention the Dalai Lama, and they think Maharishi, > and parrot what he told them to think about the > Dalai Lama. I mention anything else, and they parrot > what they were told to think about it by Maharishi. > Your argument cuts both ways, dude. > > Maharishi *just wasn't that important*. He was just > a guy. But if I say that, people here go ballistic, > as if it were some kind of insult. And you're > suggesting that I'm the one who's slightly > "off" in this situation? :-) > > Find something else that you're interested in besides > the past and Maharishi and I'll talk about that. >
