--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <babajii_99@...> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <babajii_99@> wrote: > > > > > > (snip) > > > More like, how greedy is it, to build a nuclear power station > > > in the middle of an earthquake zone? > > > > Last time I counted there were nine large-scale > > nuclear plants in California. Both San Onofre and > > Diablo Canyon are sitting *on top of* fault lines. > > "Nuclear plants in the U.S. near fault lines are > > only built for 7.0 Earthquakes." - Edward Markey > > > > My only comment about your and Card's attempts to > > come up with some "karmic reason" for the Japan > > disaster is to roll my eyes and be thankful that > > I am not associated in any way with an organization > > in which that kind of thought could flourish and > > be expressed as if there were nothing wrong with > > it. Really sick shit. > > > Nothing is sick about karma... > It is more sick to think you can get away with killing millions of innocent > people, and not have any price to pay, either by you or your ancestors... > > Karma is not a notion of any particular movement or religion... > > It is a spiritual notion and a fact of physics... But by most accounts, it's inscrutable. So why claim knowledge of the unknowable?
