And yes, I have taken iodine, but then you can't control the next door neighbor 
from spraying round up!!! LOL, 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, m2smart4u2000 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> Offering a few other opinions. I don't see how the radiation levels are being 
> reviewed when there are only a few spots around doing the monitoring. You can 
> tell that most of the West coast doesn't believe that the radiation is 
> insignificant. I don't think we've had it around long enough to really know, 
> kind of like vacinations. Who really knows the long term affects? 
>   
> 
> Here's one little part of the following article:
> 
> FIRST WARNING SYSTEM: The first warning systems along North America's West 
> Coast are not properly equipped. They currently have no 'noble gas 
> monitoring' capability and have too little coverage.  Washington State, for 
> example, has only 4 EPA stations.  
> 
> It is crucial to understanding this because official statements from experts 
> about your exposures in the following days and weeks will sound reassuring 
> and convincing but these statements are as weak as the deficiencies in 
> radiation warning systems.
> 
> 
> http://www.idealist.ws/index.php#i131
> 
> If that doesn't scare you the following will. It's about the testing of back 
> up systems for nuclear disasters:
> 
> http://www.truth-out.org/tokyo-electric-build-us-nuclear-plants-the-no-bs-info-japans-disastrous-nuclear-operators68457
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > Excellent resource for information about the
> > Japan nuclear crisis at the Web site All Things
> > Nuclear, the blog of the Global Security Program
> > at the Union of Concerned Scientists (see more
> > about UCS at the end of this post):
> > 
> > http://allthingsnuclear.org/
> > 
> > Among other things, it has posted this statement 
> > by the Union of Concerned Scientists about 
> > potassium iodide pills:
> > 
> > -----
> > The people of Japan should be given priority 
> > access to potassium iodide (KI) pills used to 
> > protect against thyroid cancer following 
> > inhalation of radioactive iodine.
> > 
> > Given the fact that Japan is thousands of miles 
> > from the United States, it is highly unlikely 
> > that Americans would be exposed to radioactive 
> > iodine from direct inhalation of a plume from 
> > the Fukushima nuclear complex. Direct inhalation 
> > is the kind of exposure that potassium iodide 
> > pills would be most effective against.
> > 
> > Regardless, there are reports that global 
> > supplies of potassium iodide pills are being 
> > depleted because Americans are buying them, 
> > prompting fears that there will not be adequate 
> > supplies in Japan in the event of a larger 
> > radiological release.
> > 
> > Besides inhalation, another way Americans could 
> > be exposed to radioactive iodine is if 
> > agricultural products were contaminated. 
> > Radioactive iodine could be ingested by dairy 
> > cows, for example, and then would be 
> > concentrated in milk. Potassium iodide, however, 
> > would not be an effective countermeasure in that 
> > situation. Moreover, federal and state health 
> > authorities would test for such contamination 
> > and could take products off the market if 
> > necessary.
> > -----
> > 
> > http://allthingsnuclear.org/tagged/Japan_nuclear
> > 
> > If you're inclined to pooh-pooh the Union of
> > Concerned Scientists as just another 
> > Establishment group, you might find what various
> > critics have said about it of interest:
> > 
> > "The most vocal critics of the Union of 
> > Concerned Scientists assert that the 
> > organization harbors a liberal 'pro-regulation, 
> > anti-business' agenda. In 2004, the conservative 
> > media watchdog Media Research Center called the 
> > UCS an 'unlabeled left-wing activist group'; in 
> > 2007, the watchdog's founder L. Brent Bozell 
> > reiterated this assertion. In 2009, the 
> > conservative website NewsMax described the UCS 
> > as a 'left-wing' organization that 'receives 
> > substantial donations from liberal-leaning 
> > foundations.' Libertarian author and television 
> > personality John Stossel has also accused the 
> > organization of having a 'left-wing' agenda.
> > 
> > "In 2006, two physicists associated with the 
> > American Physical Society criticized the UCS for 
> > not supporting a government-run nuclear waste 
> > reprocessing program. The UCS has also been 
> > criticized by skeptics of global warming. In 
> > 2007, the conservative think tank Capital 
> > Research Center accused the UCS of waging a 
> > 'jihad against climate skeptics', and 
> > televangelist Jerry Falwell even cautioned 
> > Evangelical Christians against 'falling 
> > for...global warming hocus-pocus' propagated in 
> > the mass media, with the UCS 'leading the 
> > charge'."
> > 
> > Dunno about anybody else, but any organization
> > criticized by NewsMax as having a "liberal 'pro-
> > regulation, anti-business' agenda" is OK with me.
> > 
> > Another source I don't suspect of siding with 
> > the Establishment is Boing Boing, which has this 
> > thoroughly researched post on radiation levels
> > in the U.S.:
> > 
> > http://www.boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29
> > 
> > http://tinyurl.com/4bv8w7f
> >
>


Reply via email to